10.1.15

Dave Asprey, Bulletproof Coffee, Gurus, and Nonsense - Danger & Play

Dave Asprey, Bulletproof Coffee, Gurus, and Nonsense

Dear Danger & Play:


What do you think of the Bulletproof Executive (Dave Asprey) and Bulletproof coffee?
The Bulletproof Executive claims he boosted his IQ by 20 points and
gained all sorts of muscle and that if you drink his overpriced coffee
and follow his advice, you’ll become a superman.


Here’s my question:


Where is Dave Asprey’s data?
I have posted my blood work before. You can find it right here. (Here’s how to find out your testosterone level.)


I have a DEXA scan from 2009. I have labs showing my testosterone and cholesterol and fasting glucose levels going back to 2007.


And I don’t even market myself as being part of the “quantified self”
movement. I’m not some super data nerd and I sure  don’t make my living
selling people on my health and fitness advice. (Maybe I should start a
YouTube channel?)


Anyone who tells you how to live a healthy lifestyle and who sells you stuff must show his lab work. This is not optional.


The Bulletproof Exective claims he boosted his IQ by 20 points.
OK. Where are his IQ tests? Where has he uploaded them? I looked on his page and can’t find them. Where are they?


The Bulletproof Executive claims his diet boost testosterone levels and is healthy.
OK. Where are his blood tests and lab work? What is his HDL and LDL
ratio? What are his fasting glucose and fasting insulin levels?


What is his natural testosterone level? Does Dave Asprey even have “natural” testosterone anymore, or has he been on testosterone replacement therapy? (I can determine whether someone is on TRT by looking at their labs.)


I don’t care what someone says unless he shows me his blood work.


Until Dave Asprey, the Bulletproof Executive (and this goes for all
the gurus) post their lab work for public consumption, they do not
deserve one penny of your money.


By the way, those “in the know” realize why those guys aren’t posting
their labs. Let’s just say that A-Rod isn’t the only one who attributes
his peak performance to natural products while also going in for
treatments at the “anti-aging clinic.”


I’m not hating on anyone, by the way. Dave Asprey seems like a
nice-enough guy. He’s just hustling to make a living like the rest of
us. That said, since he is a public figure, he is subject to public
scrutiny.


Our collective view on drug use is primitive. It’s downright silly that men fear going on testosterone replacement therapy. If
Dave Asprey is juiced to the gills and popping Modafinil like pop
rocks, good for him. Just don’t use drugs and then claim it’s your
“toxin-free” coffee that’s doing the heavy lifting for you.


It’s illogical that a woman who wants to “become” a man can take male
hormones but a man who wants to become more of a man cannot.


Why is it wrong for a man to take something to
make him a better man while it’s right for a woman to take a drug to
become a man?
Just don’t try acting like some dietary guru or supplement pimp
unless you’re proving your claims, especially when proving your claims
is as simple as posting lab work. Again, I have posted my lab work even
though I am not selling my expertise.


So shouldn’t people who claim to be experts and who want to reach
into your pockets go above and beyond what this humble blogger has done?


Where is the Bulletproof Executive’s lab work? He – like me – should have lab work dating back at least several years.


Once I am able to look at his lab work, I’ll be able to form an opinion. Until then, you should save your money.


Read next: Cooking for Men.

Latest in Paleo 127: Bite the Bullet - Bulletproof Diet skeptic

Latest in Paleo 127: Bite the Bullet - Paleo Podcast - Latest in Paleo Podcast - Paleo Diet - Paleo Fitness - Paleo News




Latest in Paleo 127: Bite the Bullet



On this week's show we cover some contentious topics including the recently released Bulletproof Diet

2.1.15

This Guy's Eaten Nothing but Raw Meat for Five Years | VICE | Australia / NZ

This Guy's Eaten Nothing but Raw Meat for Five Years | VICE | Australia / NZ

Meet Derek Nance. Five years ago, Derek had some mystery illness that
killed his appetite and made him puke up everything he ate. The doctors
suspected it was an allergy thing, so Derek changed his diet. First he
cut the wheat and dairy, but he still continued losing weight. Getting
desperate, he was soon online, chatting to people pushing all manner of
lifesaving diets. Derek tried a Mediterranean diet (fish and vegetables)
before ditching the fish and eventually becoming a vegan, but nothing
worked. Finally, a guy who’d had similar symptoms recommended a
carnivorous version of the Paleolithic diet. With nothing to lose, Derek
gave raw meat a try. That was five years ago and he now goes so far as
to brush his teeth with animal fat. For reasons I don’t properly
understand I wanted to watch Derek eat a meal and he obliged. I found
him with his girlfriend, Joanne, in Lexington, Kentucky, and we talked
about vital organs, rotten meat, and health, which is the main point of
this according to Derek. He’s never been healthier.
VICE: Hi, Derek. Can you tell me more about this diet? Whose idea was this?
Derek: So it was started by a dentist named Weston
Price who in the 1930s studied the health benefits of eating more raw
foods, including meats. He studied the Native Americans and a few of
them who lived on a guts-and-grease diet. He found people in primitive
communities were much healthier than we are today, and I thought, All right, I’ll give it a try.
Was there any deliberation?
Not really because I’d been sick for such a long time that I was
willing to give anything a try. I had a couple of goats in my yard that I
was using for milk, and, you know, I was tired of milking them, so I
slaughtered them. I ate both of those goats, all raw, and just switched
over like that.
Dear God. Did it make you sick?
No. Maybe what you get at first is a little diarrhea, but that’s just
your digestive system adapting. After the first week, I felt absolutely
great, and I never went back.
Derek’s dinner. Chunks of lamb and fat.
And you’ve eaten nothing else since?
Yeah, for nearly six years. I’m into lamb, mainly. It’s just easy to go
out to farms, barter over a decent price, slaughter it, and throw it in
the truck. It’s a lot harder to deal with beef because it’s a lot
bigger. Pigs are kind of a no-no because they shoot them full of
hormones and raise them on grains, which promote bacterial growth.
How do you avoid scurvy?
The organ meat of the animal actually contains vitamin C. And the thing
about vitamin C is that you need more of it in a high-carbohydrate
diet, but if you’re eating carnivorously, there’s enough in the animal
flesh. So I just eat the organ meat and the connective tissue and
everything else.
Derek’s hit of vitamin C. A jar of sheep organs and clotted blood. 
What happens if you go to a friend’s house for dinner?
If I go to a friend’s house, most people will allow me to bring a little bit of my own food. Same with if I go out for dinner.
But don’t you get sick of eating the same thing all the time?
No. There’s something that happens during the adaption process. About
three weeks in I noticed this real strong blood-like taste in the back
of my throat and then all of a sudden I started getting strong cravings
for it. The idea of cooked meat no longer appeals. It just tastes
burned. And herbs and spices too, I used to season the meat, but
seasonings no longer appeal either.
You also eat rotten meat. Why do you eat rotten meat?
It’s a probiotic. Half of the problem with my digestion was actually
just lack of enzymes. My body just doesn’t produce enough enzymes to
digest starchy foods. So the probiotic bacteria in rotten meat actually
help me to digest the food.
Derek lets chunks of lamb rot in a jar before he eats them.
Have you ever explained your diet to a vegetarian?
Well, my girlfriend is a vegetarian.
Joanne, you’re a vegetarian?
Joanne: Yes. Well, more omnivore with vegan
tendencies. I’ve tried Derek’s diet—we had lamb tenderloins once and
they were delicious, but I’m a vegetarian for compassionate reasons.
Derek and Joanne.
So you guys talk about your difference in opinion?
Yeah and I understand his reasoning because for him this is his health.
I think I can eat anything and it doesn’t affect me. That’s a big
difference between us.
And Derek, you’re comfortable personally slaughtering animals?
Well if an animal lives in accordance with its nature, I have no
problem ethically slaughtering that animal. But if you raise that animal
in a pen, and when it’s sick just shoot it up with antibiotics, I have
real problems with that. It’s not just unfair on the animal, it’s unfair
on the people who eat it.
Your fridge looks like it belongs to Satan. What are we looking at here?
It’s a Shetland sheep. It’s got a very mild, sweet flavor. I crack open
the skull and eat the brain. It’s kind of a delicacy, so I’ll wait
until the weekend to get into it.
What’s the worst thing about this diet?
Being an outcast. My family thinks I’ve lost it. They literally think
I’m off-the-deep-end insane and I don’t know why. Eating raw meat is
just something they can’t accept. My father has a master's in biology
and tells me that if I eat raw meat, I’ll get some sort of pathogen.
Joanne: Yeah, that’s weird. I’m not even allowed to
mention Derrick’s diet around them. They say, “That’s wrong! He’ll die,”
and they just get really emotional about it.
Will you ever stop this diet?
No, not by choice. If they haul me away, kicking and screaming, then maybe.
And you’ve recently become a butcher. Can you tell me about that?
Well, I was going out to farms for years slaughtering my own animals
and one of the guys at these farms needed some help so I offered. Now
I’m learning the trade from the ground up and I get lots of scraps to
snack on. Before I was an electrician, but I’ll do anything. Joanne runs
a vegan juice bar so sometimes I’ll help out there. That’s just life.
Follow Julian on Twitter: @MorgansJulian

1.1.15

There’s Something Really Wrong With Science These Days | Brain Blogger

There’s Something Really Wrong With Science These Days | Brain Blogger



Magnifier Over Tablet

by Sara Adaes, PhD (c) | December 26, 2014

The wakeup call came when news broke in late November about a rather obvious nonsensical article being accepted for publication in a “peer-reviewed” online journal. The article was titled “Get me off your fucking mailing list” and it basically just repeated this request over and over again throughout 10 pages. It even had a flow diagram and a scatter plot graph reiterating the demand. It was beautiful.

The bogus article was created in 2005 by computer scientists David Maziรจres and Eddie Kohler to be used as a reply to all the spam invitations they kept receiving to attend conferences or to publish in new open-access journals for a fee. The article circulated among colleagues and was used by another computer scientist as a reply to a spam email from the pompously titled International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology. Obviously, nobody ever thought it could even be considered for publication, they just wanted to send a clear message.

But well, what do you know! It got accepted! And the acceptance email was marvelous! It included a peer-review report stating that the article was excellent and an acceptance letter stating that only minor changes were required! MINOR CHANGES to all the “Get me off your fucking mailing list” requests! This is hilarious, but it also makes me cringe.

Spam emailing from predatory online journals that will publish anything for a fee has become a pandemic in the last few years. These journals keep mushrooming and this has even led Jeffrey Beall, a librarian at the University of Colorado to create a list of all the known predatory publications out there. And it keeps being updated.

But how did we get here?

Science depends on publishing. That’s how you share your results with the world. It’s desirable and inevitable. And there’s a massive business around science publishing. A business that thrives on that inevitable desire to publish. A business that takes years’ worth of scientists’ work, arranges for (free) peer-reviews, makes scientists give up their copyrights, and prints the journals. That’s it. Some publishers don’t even print journals anymore, they’re online-only. In a sense, all journals are predatory. The rest of the world can then pay to read the articles, either by subscribing to a journal or by buying access to a specific paper, or they can access them for free as long as the authors have paid an exorbitant open-access publishing fee.

But it just so happens that science itself has become a rather predatory business. “Publish or perish” is the maxim among scientists. There are highly competitive contexts in which you either produce a significant amount of articles or you get canned. Science and scientists’ careers are now evaluated quantitatively rather than qualitatively.

Science metrics have become a widely debated issue. But it somehow feels that it’s all gone out of control. Young scientists trying to establish themselves and earn grants to fund their research are an easy target for predatory journals. The temptation of an easy publication is overpowering.

This is giving rise to really bad science; shortcuts, “embellishments”, and even fake results are all over. As a consequence, article retractions are growing at an alarming rate. According to Retraction Watch (a blog that tracks retractions and lets the world finally know about them), Nature, a highly rigorous and respected journal, whose acceptance criteria are supposed to be unquestionable, retracted six papers in 2013 and nine in 2014. That’s a lot, and that’s just from Nature.

There are now even elaborate scams for publishing, such as fake peer-reviews done by the authors themselves by indicating fake email addresses for their suggested reviewers. This goes so far that there are now companies offering manuscript preparation services that can even include the submission of fake peer-reviews by fabricating contact details for peer-reviewers. Just recently, Retraction Watch reported that BioMed Central has uncovered about fifty manuscripts in their editorial system that involved fake peer-reviewers, and that Elsevier was retracting sixteen papers across three of its journals after the publisher discovered that one of the authors orchestrated fake peer-reviews.

I don’t know where this will lead us, but the scientific community really needs to think about it.

Image via Dragon Images / Shutterstock.

Most exaggeration in health news is already present in academic press releases | EurekAlert! Science News

Most exaggeration in health news is already present in academic press releases | EurekAlert! Science News

The researchers suggest that improving the accuracy of academic
press releases "could represent a key opportunity for reducing
misleading health related news."

Health related news has widespread potential to influence health
related behaviour but often misreports the science. It is not known
whether exaggerations - claims going beyond those made in the research
paper - originate in the news stories themselves or in press releases
issued by academic institutions producing the research.

So a team, led by Professors Petroc Sumner and Chris Chambers at
Cardiff University, set out to identify the source (press releases or
news) of distortions, exaggerations, or changes to the main conclusions
drawn from research that could potentially influence a reader's health
related behaviour.

They analysed 462 press releases on biomedical and health related
science issued by 20 leading UK universities in 2011, alongside their
associated peer reviewed research papers and 668 national news stories.

They focused on three common types of exaggeration: giving direct
advice to readers to change their behaviour, making causal claims from
correlational (observational) data, and making inference about humans
from animal findings.

They found that 40% of press releases contained exaggerated advice,
33% contained exaggerated causal claims, and 36% contained exaggerated
inference to humans from animal research, compared with the
corresponding peer reviewed journal articles.

And when press releases contained exaggeration it was more likely
that the news would too (58% for advice, 81% for causal claims, and 86%
for inference to humans). But when press releases did not contain
exaggeration, rates of exaggeration in news were only 17%, 18%, and 10%,
respectively. However, there was little evidence that exaggeration in
press releases increased the uptake of news.

The authors point out that this is an observational study so no definitive conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect.

Although it is common to blame media outlets and their journalists
for news perceived as exaggerated, sensationalised, or alarmist, "our
principle findings were that most of the inflation detected in our study
did not occur de novo in the media but was already present in the text
of the press releases produced by academics and their establishments,"
they write.

The blame - if it can be meaningfully apportioned - they say, "lies
mainly with the increasing culture of university competition and self
promotion, interacting with the increasing pressures on journalists to
do more with less time."

The scientific community has the ability to improve this situation,
they conclude. Press releases could be a primary target to improve the
accuracy of science news, with potential benefit for public health.

In an accompanying editorial, Ben Goldacre, Research Fellow at the
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and author of the book
Bad Science, argues that academics should be made accountable for
exaggerations in press releases about their own work.

Academic press releases should be treated as a part of the
scientific publication, he says. They should include named individuals
from the original research paper; they should be linked to the paper
they are promoting; and presented as online data appendices, in full
view of peers. There should also be opportunity for feedback in the
publishing journal.

"Collectively this would produce an information trail, and
accountability among peers and the public," he writes. And he speculates
whether a public ranking of press releases "might change academic
behaviour, and create an environment where researchers finally act to
prevent patients and the public being routinely misled."



Lactose intolerance and risk of lung, breast and ovarian cancers: aetiological clues from a population-based study in Sweden | ReadCube Articles

Lactose intolerance and risk of lung, breast and ovarian cancers: aetiological clues from a population-based study in Sweden | ReadCube Articles

Stanford Prevention Research Center,  

Stanford University School of Medicine,
Stanford, CA, USA


Conclusions: 
In this large cohort study, people with lactose intolerance, characterised by low consumption of milk and other dairy products, had decreased risks of lung, breast, and ovarian cancers, but the decreased risks were not found in their family members, suggesting that the protective effects against these cancers may be related to their specific dietary pattern

Background:
Individuals with lactose intolerance are recommended to avoid milk or  dairy products, which may affect the development of cancer.


Methods: We identified individuals with lactose intolerance from several Swedish Registers linked to the Swedish Cancer Registry to calculate standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) for cancers in the breast, lung, and ovary.


Results:
A total of 22 788 individuals with lactose intolerance were identified, and their risks of lung (SIR ¼ 0.55), breast (SIR ¼ 0.79), and ovarian (SIR ¼ 0.61) cancers were significantly decreased. Cancer incidences in  the siblings and parents of individuals with lactose intolerance were similar to those in the general population.

27.12.14

Rodent Study Confirms: GMO Soybean Oil is Pro-Inflammatory & Induces DNA Damage! Extra Virgin Olive Oil to the Rescue! - SuppVersity: Nutrition and Exercise Science for Everyone

Rodent Study - GMO Soybean Oil is Pro-Inflammatory & Induces DNA Damage! Extra Virgin Olive Oil to the Rescue



GMO Soybean oil? Better for cars only.
I am pretty sure there will be rebuttals to the results of this study... although, it's published in the OpenSource journal Nutrients
and was conducted by scientists from Saudi Arabia and the UK who
probably don't have the media-connections the scientists who conducted
the GMO-corn study back in the day had.



Against that background it's unlikely that non-SuppVersity-readers will even hear about the paper El-Kholy et al. published in the June edition of Nutrients (El-Kohly. 2014) -- Well, that is - unless you spread the word, obviously ;-)

25.12.14

Ketogenic Diets, I: Ways to Make a Diet Ketogenic - Perfect Health Diet | Perfect Health Diet

Ketogenic Diets, I: Ways to Make a Diet Ketogenic



I was going to write a single post about how to implement a therapeutic ketogenic (ketone-generating) diet.

But then I thought it was worth spelling out issues in some detail.
There are various ways to make a diet ketogenic, and different ways are
appropriate in different diseases. Also, different diseases may call for
a different balance between three criteria:

1)      Safety. Does the diet generate side effects?

2)      Therapy. Is the diet as curative as it can be?

3)      Pleasurability and practicality. Is the diet unnecessarily expensive, unpalatable, or boring?

I soon realized that with so many factors affecting diet design, it
would be hard to fit everything into a single post. So I’m going to
split up the discussion into parts. Today I’ll look at the various ways
to make a diet ketogenic. On Tuesday I’ll look at how to design a diet
for Kindy’s NBIA kids. We’ll look at what they’re eating now, and
consider ways they might be able to improve their diets further – and,
hopefully, get further improvements in health, longevity, and function.

Maybe we’ll look at some other diseases after that, or maybe I’ll
just move on to the lemon juice series I’ve been planning. The lemon
juice and acid-base balance issues will fit in nicely since kidney
stones and acidosis are risks of ketogenic diets and lemon juice
relieves those risks.

So: how can we make a diet ketogenic?

What Is a Ketone?

The liver is responsible for making sure that the body (but
especially the brain and heart) have access to a sufficient supply of
energy from the blood. To fulfill that responsibility, it manufactures
two energy substrates – glucose and ketones – and exports them into the blood as needed.

The most important ketones are acetoacetic acid and beta-hydroxybutyric acid.

Ketones are water-soluble small molecules. They diffuse throughout
the body into cells, and are taken up by mitochondria and oxidized for
energy.

Ketones are especially important to neurons, which can only consume
glucose or ketones. So if something is wrong with glucose metabolism,
ketones can be the sole usable energy source of neurons. (Other cell
types, but not neurons, burn fats.)

Manufacture of Glucose and Ketones During Starvation

While preparing this post, I was surprised at how long it took for
doctors to appreciate that ketones are an acceptable alternative energy
source for the brain. The realization that the brain doesn’t perpetually
rely on glucose during starvation apparently didn’t sink in until 1967!

The use of prolonged starvation for the treatment of
obesity has posed a fascinating problem; namely, that man is capable of
fasting for periods of time beyond which he would have utilized all of
his carbohydrate resources and all of his proteins for gluconeogenesis
in order to provide adequate calories as glucose for the central nervous
system.

This study was designed to clarify the apparent paradox, and it was
found that beta-hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate replace glucose as the
brain’s primary fuel during starvation. [1]
This makes it a bit easier to understand why ketogenic diets have not
yet become standard therapies for neurological diseases. Epileptics
caught a lucky break – the ketogenic diet was already in use for
epilepsy in the 1920s. The ketogenic diet’s therapeutic potential for
other neurological disorders probably couldn’t have been appreciated
until after 1967, and by then medicine had turned its back on dietary
therapy.

But back to ketones. During starvation, glucose and ketones have to
be manufactured from body parts. The body’s resources include:

  • Glycogen – a storage form of glucose. However, glycogen supplies are minimal.
  • “Complete” protein – a mix of amino acids similar to that found in animal meats.
  • Long-chain fats – fatty acids 14-carbons or longer in length,
    attached to a glycerol backbone as either triglycerides or
    phospholipids.
During starvation, different raw materials end up as different energy substrates:

  • Glycogen can be used to make glucose but not ketones. So glycogen converts 100% to glucose.
  • Protein is broken down into its constituent amino acids. Some amino
    acids can become glucose but never ketones; some can become either; some
    can become ketones but glucose. “Complete” protein usually found in the
    body typically converts 46% to ketones, 54% to glucose. [UPDATE: Actually, this is incorrect. As Tony Mach points out in the comments,
    complete protein converts 20% to ketones, 80% to glucose. The 46-54
    ratio is the contribution to Wilder’s ketogenic ratio, see below.]
  • Triglycerides and phospholipids are broken up into their constituent
    parts. The fatty acids can make ketones but not glucose; the glycerol
    backbones can make glucose but not ketones. Typically, 10-12% of energy
    from a triglyceride is in the form of glycerol (which has the potential
    to become glucose) and 88-90% is in the form of fatty acids (which have
    the potential to become ketones).
As we note in the book, during starvation the body is cannibalizing
tissues that are roughly 74% fat, 26% protein by calories. Due to the
preponderance of fat, starvation is highly “ketogenic” (ketone
generating). The 26% of calories that are protein generate roughly equal
amounts of ketones and glucose, but the 74% of calories that are fat
generate only ketones.

This doesn’t mean that during starvation ketones are 87% of energy
and glucose 13% of energy. Most of the fats are burnt directly for
energy without conversion to ketones. But a fair amount of fats are
diverted into ketone production, and ketones are abundant during
starvation.

A Ketogenic Diet Using “Body Part Foods”

If your diet could include only compounds found in the body –
glucose, complete protein, and long-chain fats stored as triglycerides
or phospholipids – then we can use the above numbers to estimate the
“ketogenic potential” of the diet.

I have to credit commenter “Cathy” at the PaNu Forum for this next part. Kindy posted a question about the ketogenic diet for NBIA on the PaNu Forum in October 2010, and Cathy left an informative comment:

The ketogenic formula was originally developed by Wilder
at the Mayo clinic in the 1920’s. By googling WILDER KETOGENIC FORMULA, I
found a link to the book “The Ketogenic Diet: A Treatment for Epilepsy”
published in 2000. Quite a bit of the book is available for reading
online; here is the URL
.

On page 36 of this book is Wilder’s formula for the ketogenic potential of a diet:



This formula basically treats all fats as triglycerides of long-chain
fatty acids, and protein as “complete” protein with a typical mix of
amino acids. It makes a ratio of the ketone precursors to the glucose
precursors.

Wilder’s “ketogenic ratio” was used by Dr. Richard Bernstein in his Diabetes Solution
to help people appraise the ketogenicity of a diet. A ratio below 1.5
signifies a minimally ketogenic diet; the higher the ratio goes above
1.5, the more ketones will be generated.

Other Dietary Ketone Precursors

If you’re not starving, you have the opportunity to eat foods that are not components of the body, and that are more ketogenic than “body part foods.”

Specifically, you can eat:

  • Short-chain fats such as are found in coconut oil.
  • A mix of amino acids that is not “complete,” but is biased toward the ketogenic amino acids.
If you do this then your diet will be more ketogenic than Wilder’s formula would suggest.

Eating these foods may be advantageous. For instance, suppose you want to eat enough carbs to avoid “zero-carb dangers” such as mucus deficiency.
At the same time, you want to generate abundant ketones to nourish the
brain. You can achieve both by eating carbs for glucose, but also eating
short-chain fats and ketogenic amino acids to make ketones.

So let’s look at why these foods are so effective at producing ketones.

Amino Acids

The main metabolic process which converts one metabolic substrate into another is called the citric acid cycle, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, or Krebs cycle.

The TCA cycle looks like this (blue arrows):



The passage from succinyl CoA to fumarate is where ATP is made. The cycle can be fed in several ways:

  • By pyruvate which is an intermediate produced in glucose metabolism;
  • By acetyl CoA which is an intermediate produced by ketones or fatty acid oxidation;
  • By amino acids which can enter the TCA cycle at various points.
The green boxes show glucogenic amino acids entering the cycle. The white boxes show ketogenic
amino acids that are made into either acetyl CoA or acetoacetyl CoA and
thence can either leave as ketones (via HMG-CoA) or enter the cycle by
conversion of acetyl CoA to citrate.

The crucial takeaway, as far as this post is concerned, is the distribution of amino acids among green and white boxes:

  • Leucine and lysine appear only in white boxes, not in green boxes. They are purely ketogenic.
  • Isoleucine, tryptophan, phenylalanine, and tyrosine appear in both
    green and white boxes. They can be either ketogenic or glucogenic.
  • The other amino acids appear only in green boxes and are purely glucogenic.
So if the diet is rich in leucine and lysine, but poor in glucogenic amino acids, then it will be highly ketogenic.

Short-Chain Fats

Fats are made into acetyl CoA. Acetyl CoA can either enter the TCA
cycle or be converted to ketones. What decides which way it goes?

One important factor is whether the cell has enough ATP. If the cell
has plenty of ATP then it won’t allow the TCA cycle to make any more,
and the TCA cycle gets stuffed with succinyl CoA and then with all the
other intermediates in the pipeline behind it.

Once the TCA cycle is full, acetyl CoA no longer enters the cycle and instead leaves as ketones.

Long-chain fats can follow this route, but not terribly easily. They have alternatives:

  • Long-chain fats can serve as structural molecules in cell membranes throughout the body.
  • Long-chain fats can be stored in adipose cells.
  • Long-chain fats can be burned by cells throughout the body, and transported to cells that need them.
These factors mean that you have to eat a very large amount of long-chain fats before you produce substantial ketones.

Short-chain fats (12 carbons or less in length; often called
medium-chain) are different. Short-chain fats do not appear in cell
membranes and are not stored in adipose tissue (except for a little
12-carbon fatty acids). Rather than being transported throughout the
body, they are shunted to the liver for disposal.

This means that if you eat a lot of coconut oil (which is 58%
short-chain fats), you deliver a lot of fat to the liver for disposal.
The disposal process for fat is conversion to acetyl CoA followed by
either burning in the TCA cycle or conversion to ketones.

After a big cup of coconut oil is delivered to the liver, the liver’s
ATP levels are quickly saturated. The TCA cycle is stuffed and the
liver will dispose of the coconut oil by making ketones.

It will do this whether the rest of the body needs the ketones or not. The liver wants to get rid of the coconut oil, and it does it by making ketones whether the rest of the body wants them or not.

Summary

So we have three ways to make the diet ketogenic:

1)      Make Wilder’s “ketogenic ratio” high by eating a lot of fat, very few carbs, and not too much protein.

2)      Supplement with the ketogenic amino acids lysine and leucine.

3)      Supplement with coconut oil or another source of short-chain fats.

If we do (2) or (3), then the diet can be ketogenic even if it has a fair number of carbs.

So now we have an arsenal of ways to generate ketones. We have to
look at diseases and diet risks to figure out which way of making the
diet ketogenic is optimal.

I’ll look at that next week.

References

[1] Owen OE et al. Brain metabolism during fasting. J Clin Invest. 1967 Oct;46(10):1589-95. http://pmid.us/6061736.

3.12.14

Prolonged fasting 're-boots' immune system - Medical News Today

Prolonged fasting 're-boots' immune system - Medical News Today



Results of a new study on mice and a phase 1 trial of humans
suggest that prolonged

cycles of fasting - for 2-4 days at a time - not only protect against
toxic effects of chemotherapy, but also trigger stem cell regeneration
of new immune cells

and clearing out of old, damaged cells.


The study, by researchers from the University of Southern California (USC) in Los Angeles, and published in the journal Cell Stem Cell, is the first to show that a natural intervention

can trigger regeneration of an organ or system through stem cells.

The team believes the findings could benefit people with immune system damage, for example if

they have received chemotherapy treatment for cancer. It could also benefit the elderly whose

immune systems are weakened through aging, making them more susceptible to disease.

The scientists say prolonged fasting appears to shift stem cells of the immune system from a

dormant state to an active state of self-renewal.


Results from experiments with mice and a phase 1 human clinical trial showed that long periods

of fasting significantly lowered levels of white blood cells. In the mice, it flipped a switch

that changed the signaling pathways of hematopoietic stem cells - a group of stem cells that

generate blood and immune systems.

"We could not predict that prolonged fasting would have such a remarkable effect in promoting

stem cell-based regeneration of the hematopoietic system," says Valter Longo, a professor of

Gerontology and the Biological Sciences at the USC Davis School of Gerontology, and director of the

USC Longevity Institute.

He says that when you stop eating, the body uses up stored glucose, fat and ketones, and also

recycles worn out and damaged immune cells.

"What we started noticing in both our human work and animal work is that the white blood cell

count goes down with prolonged fasting," he explains. "Then when you re-feed, the blood cells come

back. So we started thinking, well, where does it come from?"

In mice, prolonged fasting replenished worn out immune cells with new ones

Empty plate

The
researchers found that fasting for 2-4 days reduced PKA, an enzyme that
is involved in extending lifespan in simple organisms.
In mice, prolonged periods of fasting - repeated cycles of 2-4 days with no food - over

the course of 6 months, killed older and damaged immune cells and generated new ones.

During each fasting cycle, the drop in white cell levels triggered a stem-cell based

regeneration of new immune cells. In particular, prolonged fasting reduced PKA, an enzyme that the

team had previously discovered is involved in extending lifespan in simple organisms.


Other studies have also linked PKA to the control of stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency -

the extent to which they can become different cell-types.

Prolonged fasting also led to a drop in IGF-1, a growth factor hormone linked to aging, cancer

and tumor progression.

Switching off the gene for PKA is the key step that triggers the stem cells to shift to

regeneration, Prof. Longo says. "It gives the OK for stem cells to go ahead and begin

proliferating and rebuild the entire system."

And the good news, he adds, is that the body also rids itself "of the parts of the system

that might be damaged or old, the inefficient parts, during the fasting. Now, if you start with a

system heavily damaged by chemotherapy or aging, fasting cycles can generate, literally, a new

immune system."

Three-day fast protected cancer patients from toxic chemo effects

In a clinical trial involving a small group of cancer patients, the team also found that

fasting for 3 days before receiving chemotherapy protected them from its toxic effects.

While chemotherapy saves lives, it also causes significant damage to the immune system, and the

team hopes their findings show that fasting may help to minimize some of that harm.

Meanwhile, there is no suggestion that people should try to get these same effects by prolonged

fasting, which should only be done under medical supervision.


More clinical studies are now needed to test the effectiveness of the approach in humans and

also examine the side effects.

Prof. Longo says they are now investigating whether these same regeneration effects work with

other systems and organs as well as the immune system. His lab is already planning further animal

studies and clinical trials.

Funds from the National Institute of Aging of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the V

Foundation and the National Cancer Institute of the NIH helped finance the study.

Meanwhile, Medical News Today recently reported how stem cells show potential for brain

damage repair
. Research from Australia suggests by manipulating cell-surface proteins it may

be possible to get bone marrow stem cells to differentiate into brain cells. If the method proves

viable, it could lead to ways of generating new brain cell populations for repairing brain

damage.

Written by