Showing posts with label food - animal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label food - animal. Show all posts

1.7.11

The Bacon Bummer - Whole9

The Bacon Bummer | Whole9 | Let us change your life.
by Whole9

Extract:

The Bummer Part

You see, bacon, however delicious it might be, has some downsides.

First, factory-farmed bacon (approximately 95% of the bacon purchased in the US, according to 2007 data) is, nutritionally speaking, garbage. It’s the fattiest cut of an inhumanely treated, poorly fed, often sickly animal, and it’s loaded with unhealthy (i.e. contaminated) fats, preservatives and additives. We’d venture to call it toxic meat, but then again, we love hyperbole. Nonetheless, we think nobody should eat factory-farmed bacon – ever. 

Even in family farms where the animals are treated well, their diets are not always conducive to our optimal health. Even “pastured” pigs’ diets are often supplemented with corn, grains and soybeans. This makes this kind of pastured pork the equivalent of grain-fed cattle that get to eat a little bit of grass – and we would not designate that meat as optimally healthy for you. Because we believe high-quality, grass-finished, organic meat from ruminants (like beef, lamb and elk) is the most healthy protein source available, promoting lots of lesser quality meats like bacon – even from mostly pastured pork – doesn’t make much sense. (Nonetheless, this is not a case against pork. In a rotation of high-quality meats, 100% pastured, organic pork may have its place.)

So why aren’t we promoting 100% pastured, organic, family-farmed bacon?

Here’s where our experience comes in. Historically, when we give people a nutritional inch, they take a nutritional mile. And like a Paleo version of “telephone”, our message tends to degrade the further it spreads. When we mention that we use 100% egg white powder when we travel, people take that to mean, “It’s okay to drink protein shakes!” We say pastured, organic, clarified butter is a good food choice, they pass along, “Whole9 says eat more butter!” Which is exactly why you’ll never hear us mention bacon.

So if we mentioned 100% pastured, organic, nitrate/nitrite-free , family-farmed bacon in every web article, Facebook post and Twitter tweet, well… readers, followers, and workshop attendees would hear (and tell others), “Whole9 say eat bacon!” And then they’d tell their friends, family members and blog readers to eat more bacon, and then you’ve got a whole group of Paleo newbies buying pounds of Oscar Mayer – and consuming what could, in fact, be the unhealthiest meat product out there (besides Spam) in copious amounts. Oops. So that’s one reason we don’t pimp bacon.

6:3 (You Knew We’d Go There)

Some authors, including the highly-respected Dr. Michael Eades, compare the fatty acid profile of bacon to olive oil and conclude that they are very similar. A few percentage points of monounsaturated fat (MUFA) or saturated fat (SFA) aside, we’ll agree. Furthermore, the total polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) content of bacon fat and olive oil are almost identical. (Weird, right?) So here’s where we come back to having a consistent thought process for our recommendations.

We generally recommend against cooking with olive oil… so why would we champion cooking with bacon?

Here’s the back-story. We (and lots of Smart People like Chris Kresser and Chris Masterjohn ) recommend aggressively limiting your polyunsaturated fat intake because those fragile fats undergo peroxidation most easily (compared to MUFA and SFA). The oxidation process forms damaging free radicals that promote inflammation, contribute to aging, and increase the risk of cancer. Heating these fats and exposing them to air (oxygen) dramatically increases the rate that these fats oxidize. So, logically, we recommend that you avoid heating or cooking with fats (like olive oil) that contain these fragile, prone-to-oxidation PUFAs.

So if we believe olive oil should not be heated, and bacon and olive oil have almost the same PUFA content, why would we portray bacon as a healthy choice, given that no one eats their bacon carpaccio-style? Bacon is generally cooked in the open air at fairly high temperatures until “well done”, which smells like oxidized PUFA to us. (And given that their PUFA profile is practically identical, it also doesn’t make sense for us to recommend against cooking with olive oil, but then to give cooking with bacon fat the green light.)

The kicker is that the amount of total fat (and thus PUFA, as a percentage of the total) in a manly-sized serving of bacon is much greater than you’d get from a tablespoon-sized serving of olive oil. (Remember, it’s not just about the ratio of 6:3 in any given food or meal – it’s more about the total dose.) So dissing EVOO for cooking but crispifying a pound of bacon every morning – or frying all your food in bacon fat – just doesn’t add up to us.

Delicous Isn’t Good Enough.

Our concern is not just with the amount of – or 6:3 ratio of – pastured vs. conventional bacon – it’s not just about the fat. (And we don’t really want to debate the potential harm of nitrates/nitrites that are commonly used to preserve bacon. That smacks of justification.) The final reason we don’t promote bacon is because even if you buy the uncured, organic, 100% pastured, nitrate-free stuff, it’s still not your best protein choice. (It doesn’t even make our Top Ten, in fact.) Amy Kubal, RD, says “Many consider bacon a quality source of protein, but this is not necessarily the case compared to beef or chicken. In fact, bacon is often just as much fat as protein.

Bacon is delicious – don’t get me wrong. It’s my favorite ‘condiment’ and should be treated as just that – a condiment. A slice or two every now and then is great, but as an everyday protein option, you can do better.”


Jake 23 May, 2011 at 10:50 am # 
Cook bacon in the microwave between 4 sheets of paper towels. PUFAs have a very low melting point and they flow out to be absorbed by the paper towels. The saturated fat stays in the bacon.

30.6.11

Study (2010) - doubts saturated fat causes heart disease

Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evalua... [Am J Clin Nutr. 2010] - PubMed result

Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):535-46. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease.

Source

Children's Hospital, Oakland Research Institute Oakland, CA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

A reduction in dietary saturated fat has generally been thought to improve cardiovascular health.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence related to the association of dietary saturated fat with risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and cardiovascular disease (CVD; CHD inclusive of stroke) in prospective epidemiologic studies.

DESIGN:

Twenty-one studies identified by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and secondary referencing qualified for inclusion in this study. A random-effects model was used to derive composite relative risk estimates for CHD, stroke, and CVD.

RESULTS:

During 5-23 y of follow-up of 347,747 subjects, 11,006 developed CHD or stroke. Intake of saturated fat was not associated with an increased risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD. The pooled relative risk estimates that compared extreme quantiles of saturated fat intake were 1.07 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.19; P = 0.22) for CHD, 0.81 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.05; P = 0.11) for stroke, and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.89, 1.11; P = 0.95) for CVD. Consideration of age, sex, and study quality did not change the results.

CONCLUSIONS:

A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD. More data are needed to elucidate whether CVD risks are likely to be influenced by the specific nutrients used to replace saturated fat.

13.6.11

Harvard anti-low carb "study" pole-axed

A 2010 Harvard study with the title "Low-Carbohydrate Diets and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality" purportedly found that:
Conclusion: A low-carbohydrate diet based on animal sources was associated with higher all-cause mortality in both men and women, whereas a vegetable-based low-carbohydrate diet was associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality rates.
one to ridicule the "junk science" in this article is Dr Chris Masterjohn: The Daily Lipid: New Study Shows that Lying About Your Hamburger Intake Prevents Disease and Death When You Eat a Low-Carb Diet High in Carbohydrates

here is another - largely in laymans language: Brand-Spankin’ New Study: Are Low-Carb Meat Eaters in Trouble? « Raw Food SOS: Troubleshooting on the Raw Food Diet . its by celebrated demolisher of the China Study Denise Minger, who concludes:

Anatomy & food selection - primates vs humans

"What caused the change in colon and intestinal size?......... a shift to more energy-concentrated diets.  .......Our shrinking colon size is pretty clear evidence that our bodies started adapting to the energy-dense structure of cooked food and meat, since we no longer had to rely primarily on bulky, super-fibrous plant foods."   
                                                        Denise Minger
From:

What is the “Optimal” Diet for Humans? (Part 1) « Raw Food SOS: Troubleshooting on the Raw Food Diet

What is the “Optimal” Diet for Humans? (Part 2) « Raw Food SOS: Troubleshooting on the Raw Food Diet


Extract below:

12.6.11

Eat fat, lose fat - Mary Enig, Ph.D

note first: Scientists now saying carbs, not fat, are to blame for America's ills - latimes.com

Mary Gertrude Enig, PhD co-wrote a book called Eat Fat, Lose Fat
"Enig and Fallon attempt to correct what they see as Americans' false belief that tropical fats and oils (such as coconut and palm) are unhealthy, asserting that those fats (and coconut, especially) are beneficial saturated fats that should be more heavily incorporated into our diets. Enig, a biochemist and nutritionist, along with Fallon, president of the Weston A. Price Foundation (a non-profit dedicated to helping people implement healthy approaches to nutrition), say "high-fat, low-carb really works," eschewing the disastrous effects a high-fat diet can have on a person's heart.  Their approach skews  toward traditional diets and away from modern diets (e.g., chose animal fats over vegetable oils; raw or fermented dairy products instead of pasteurized ones)."

11.6.11

Totally carnivorous - Augustus Owsley Stanley III

 


iconic figure of the 1960's Augustus Owsley Stanley III, who died in a car crash this year at aged 76, is famous for a lot of reasons, perhaps the least known being his carnivore diet (see also: 50kzone: Largely carnivorous - "dont buy into fruit & vegetables").  in his own words:
"I have been eating the natural human dietary regime for over 47 years now. I do not eat anything whatsoever from vegetable sources. The only things veggie I use are spices. My diet is usually 60% fat and 40% protein by calories.
I used to eat 80/20 when younger and about twice as much quantity of meat also, but that seems too much energy at my age, which is 71- even though I am very active. I think the body actually becomes more efficient with energy as you age, but I have no way of proving it true. Otherwise, my body today is very like it was at the age of 30.
I figure most of what we call ‘aging’ is due to insulin damage to the collagen and other body structures. No carbs = no insulin. I don’t heal quite as fast when injured as I did as a youngster, however. But I have few wrinkles, and my skin is still strong and elastic.

Largely carnivorous - "dont buy into fruit & vegetables"

Phd nutritional biochemist and bodybuilder Dr Greg Ellis (pictured - and see: 50kzone: Body fueled by fat, not carbs - Dr. Greg Ellis ) talks about why he has hardly eaten any fruit and vegetables for 15 years.

now 64, he eats largely meat (see also: 50kzone: Totally carnivorous - Augustus Owsley Stanley III).  his approach is partly  to minimise glycation, a topic he has written a book on called the "Glycation Factor", and  see:
- 50kzone: Glycation - Wikipedia
- 50kzone: Glycation - causes disease and aging
- 50kzone: Glycation - heart disease and cancer

his approach is also based on the view that fruit and vegetables are nutritionally unnecessary.  he says:
"I want to keep glucose out of my body, and I can only do that by not eating carbohydrates"

"fruits are very high in carbohydrates.....and fructose is a nasty actor too"

"I see no nutritional need for fruit and vegetables....that all started 100 years ago....I don't buy into the need for them"



Ellis says that our bodies can run amazingly well on a fat and protein based diet, and with very little carbohydrates (in his case less than 50 grams per day).  further resources on him:
Largely carnivorous - "dont but into fruit & vegetables"

    28.5.11

    "The China Study" (nutrition & disease) - debunked

    article by Denise Minger on the China Study here:
    http://rawfoodsos.com/the-china-study/

    articles by Chris Masterjohn (Phd candidate) here:
    http://blog.cholesterol-and-health.com/; and
    http://www.cholesterol-and-health.com/

     The China Study is relied upon by many as strong evidence demonstrating the adverse health impact of  animal-based foods, and in favor of a vegetarian diet.  Linked below are commentaries that many believe invalidate the conclusions of the China study:
    "The China Study is a 2005 book by T. Colin Campbell, Jacob Gould Schurman Professor Emeritus of Nutritional Biochemistry at Cornell University, and his son, Thomas M. Campbell II.[1] It examines the relationship between the consumption of animal products and illnesses such as cancers of the breast, prostate, and large bowel, diabetes, coronary heart disease, obesity, autoimmune disease, osteoporosis, degenerative brain disease, and macular degeneration.[2]

    "The China Study" of the title is taken from the China-Cornell-Oxford Project, a survey that studied the relationship between mortality rates and the diets and lifestyles of 6,500 people in 65 rural counties in China. Described by The New York Times as "the Grand Prix of epidemiology," it was conducted jointly by Cornell University, the University of Oxford, and the Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine over the course of twenty years; T. Colin Campbell was one of the project's directors. It was conducted in China because it has a genetically similar population that tends to live in the same way in the same place and eat the same foods for their entire lives.[3]

    The authors conclude that people who eat a whole plant food/vegan diet, which avoids animal proteins such as beef, poultry, eggs, fish, and milk, will minimize or reverse the development of chronic diseases"